Monsanto’s GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals

•February 22, 2012 • Leave a Comment

Monsanto’s GMO Corn Linked To Organ Failure, Study Reveals.


Esoteric Adventures in Nashville

•July 5, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Magic mushrooms on CNN – Long lasting postive effects

•July 5, 2011 • Leave a Comment

The Truth about your Birth Certificate

•July 3, 2011 • Leave a Comment

Constitutional Homeland Security

•May 28, 2011 • 1 Comment

Chapter Ten

A suggested external program for a Citizen’s Homeland Security Association

The second part of a CHSA’ss program is external. The ultimate goal of all the CHSAs in each State must be to recruit a politically decisive segment of her population for support of her revitalized Militia. In light of widespread ignorance on this subject, skepticism as to the workability of the militia under contemporary conditions, and opposition from entrenched special interests and their political puppets, for DHSAs to lead their communities effectively they must engage in energetic proselytization – taking advantage of every opportunity to convince everyone who will listen of the soundness, usefulness, and neccessity of revitalizing the Militia in general, and of adopting the specific plans they advocate in particular.

A. CHSAs must be consisten and convincing in their message:

First, the alternatives facing this country are either WE THE PEOPLE as the source of tru “homeland security” or what no one can deny is being set up by design or default, but which no common American desires: namely, a national police state, interlocked from top to bottom with professional, para-militarized State and Local law-enforcement agencies.

Second, for Americans to forefend such a police state, they must demand- right now- that “homeland security” be provided in strict conformity with the Constitution.

Third, the Constitution incorporates as part of “the supreme Law of the Land” the indisputable finding of historical fact and conclusion of law that, in America, “a well regulated Militia” is “necessary to the security of a free State”.

Fourth, to enforce the Constitution of behalf of homeland security” necessarily entails mobilization of the Militia throughout America.

Fifth, suitably updated and phased into operation, the pattern of regulation of the Militia universally employed during pre-constitutional times will work today as the basis for such legislation. But,

Sixth, under the present circumstances of general neglect, the Militia require comprehensive revitalization from the ground up in each and every State.

Seventh, because Congressmen have neglected, failed, or refused to fulfill their constitutional duty “to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia:, and show no sign of mending their ways, State legislation becomes necessary. Reliance on State legislation provides fifty different political venues – each of them potentially subject to overwhelming positive influence from aroused Local communinities- in which the issue can be raised repetitively until some State finally takes the lead. Yet,

Eigth, appropriate State legislation will never be enacted in any State without unrelenting political pressure from average Americans, who must be educated, energized, enlisted, organized, and deployed for that purpose.

To be sure, such legislation may not be enacted in many, or even in a few, States at first, because average Americans exert little leerage in most State legislatures under normal political conditions. The key insight, however, is that, on issues enlightened Americans consider crucial to their immediate personal wellbeing, such as concelaed-carry permits, they can mobilize from “the grass roots” and decisively influence the legislative process in short order. Moreover, the present National concern with “homeland security” has changed political conditions and attitudes significantly. If enough common Americans in even one State come to understand how cruicial revitalization of “the Militia of the several States” is to their own and their country’s survival, they will compel its adoption there. And with that lone State as an exemplar, pressure will inexorably build up for the same result in other States.

Ninth, CHSAs offer focal points at and from which to mobilize and direct this pressure in a timely and effective fashion. And

Tenth, CHSAs provide the best, if not the only, means to encourage common Americans to perform the functions of “homeland security” in a crisis if “the Militia of the several States” are not revitalized by statute in time, and regularly constituted police and other governmental agencies are unable or unwilling to maintain constitutional law and order by “insuring domestic Tranquility, providing for the common defence, *** and securing the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”.

Propagating this messaage will require continuous multi-media campaigns throughout the comunity. CHSAs will need to create an information-bank and information -network. At a minimum, they should:
* establish Internet web sites:

* provide material for local print media- including actual columns, resources for reporters and editorialists, letters to the editor, and advertisements that explain “homeland security”, the Militia, the need for State legislation, the purpose of CHSAs, and so on;

* distribute flyers, bumper stickers, and other promotional devices;

* make speakers available for radio and televsion talk-sows, programs on local public-access cable television, and meetings of community organizations to which members of a CHSA belong or with which they have contacts; and

* supply local libraries with books, periodicals, video tapes, CDs, DVDs, and like resources.

B. CHSAs should contact and cultivate natural allies that are already well organized in the community for other purposes, that are ideologically sympathetic to revitalization of “the Militia of the several States”, that may be sources of leaders and members for the movement, and that can be encouraged to incorporate materials suitably favorable to the Militia as parts of their own programs. Chief amond these groups should be gun and outdoorsmen’s clubs, veterans’ and other patriotic and fraternal associations, civil-rights organizations dedicated to the Constitution’s “original intent”, private schools (particularly including home schools), and churches with independently minded pastors.

Particularly in the cases of schools and churches, CHSAs should offer (or help to make available) speakers, materials, equipment, facilities, and other assistance to teach:

* American history and constitutional law, with emphasis on the Militia- employing attorneys, historians, and other experts as lecturers;

* true “homeland security” – which relies on WE THE PEOPLE to provide the impetus, resources, and direction “from the bottom up”, versus false “homeland security” – which relies on a bureaucracy centralized in the District of Columbia with tentacles stretching “from the top down” into every State and Locality; and

* the safe and effective handling of firearms, the law of self-defense, marksmanship, and related subjects.

C. Particularly important is that CHSAs do everything possible to encourage among the general public a basic knowledge of and respect for firearms, then widespread private possession of firearms, and ultimately all adult Americans’ support for revitalization of “the Milita of the several States’ and participation in those Militia after the necessary statutes are enacted. Foremost should be the argument that, because WE THE PEOPLE are the Militia, and the minimum level of participation in the Militia entails personal possession and training in the safe and effective use of a suitable firearm, ammunition, and necessary accoutrements, therefore such possession and training are not only every American’s right, but also every American’s duty – a duty he may be called upon to perform at any moment in a crisis-ridden society. Each individual’s possession of an proficiency with firearms are matters of both personal and social responsibility: to himself, to his family, to his community, and to his country.

A major stumbling-block, though, is that many individuals have never had any experience with firearms at all, and because of their unfamiliearity (inevitably exacerbated by the anti-gun attitudes broadcast in the big media and drilled into students in the “public schools”) tend to view them with suspicion, if not fear. Convincing such people to support revitalization of the Militia – not only in principle but especially in their own practices – must begin by bringing them into contact with firearms under positive circumstances.

Inasmuch as proficiency with firearms beigins with ans always depends upon safety – and inasmuch as no one can disapprove of promoting safety, particularly in any community in which almost anyone could come into the proximity of a firearm at almost any time because large numbers of firearms are already in private hands – many people who ould otherwise not become involved with firearms at all could likely be positively influenced through classes in basic firearms safety to which CHSAs referred interested individuals or which CHSAs made available free of charge as a public service to all interested persons in their communities. The selling point for these classes would be that, whether an individual personally likes or dislikes firearms, it is nonetheless in his own interest, and in the interest of his family and fellow citizens, for him to understand how to handle them safely. That is, because firearms safety is everyone’s concern, acquiring a sound working knowledge of firearms and their safe operation is everyone’s responsibility.

To this end, CHSAs shold determine what classes in firearms safety are avilable in their communities, and in the absence of such classes should assemble a pool of all the instructors certified by the National Rifle Association and other accredited groups who reside in their Localities and are willing to donate their time to this educaitonal effort. Of course, before commencing such activities, CHSAs coverage, or other requirements that may apply.

D. To create credibility for “the Militia of the several States” as the premier institution for “homeland security” in the community, CHSAs will need to demonstrate what the Militia could do if they were revitalized. Ofcourse, CHSAs will not themselves be “militia” of any kind, and will enjoy no special legal status or authority. But, as a result of the knowledge and experience they will gain through their practical studies of every aspect of “homeland security”, they will be peculiarly qualified to:

* speak out for and about Local community preparedness;

* expose vulnerabilities in their communities to “terrorists” attacks, and devise methods to eliminate or alleviate them;

* try to foresee, predict the nature and extent of, and propose ways and means to prevent or to repond to possible crises and emergencies that could break out in their communities;

* critique what is, and especially what is not, being done for “homeland security” in each community;

* contrast this situation with a program of “homeland security” centered around the Militia, explaining how revitalized Militia could deal with these maters, and therefore why such Militia are needed now;

* collect citizens’ concerns, investigate citizens’ complaints, compile whatever documentaion may be avilable from public officials through the use of State and National freedom-of-information statutes, and publish comprehensive findings about the para-militarization of, and high-handed and oppressive behavior by, any State and Local police or other law-enforcement agencies that assail members of the general public with suspicion, antagonism, intimidation, and disrespect; and, throughout,

* focus unrelenting pressure on State and Local officials, bureaucrats, politicians, and the media for revitalization of the Militia.

Earning credibility and public support by predicting the need for, showing how to provide, and in an emergency actually performing what could turn out to be critically important public services in aid of “homeland security” should be as easy for members of well-regulated CHSAs as it is necessary for their communities, given how incompetent in this area politicians and bureaucrats at the National, State, and Local levels have proven themselves to be, again and gain. For example, had CHSAs been active in New Orleans for a year or so prior to Hurricne Katrina, might not the dangerous condition of the levees have been exposed, and timely remedial action demanded and probably accomplished?

The necessity for Americans to organize themselves in ChSAs ( or simlar investigatory and advocacy groups) should also be apparent to every thinking person in light of how peculiarly cunning public officials are proving themselves to be at increasing their own powers by building up a nationwide police state uder the guise of providing “homeland security”. For perhaps the most visible example, in recent years the para-militarization of State and Local police forces has spread with epidemic speed, reached ominous proprtions, and resulted in egregious abuses throughout America. Today, all too many Localities maintain a SWAT or equivalent unit the members of which are dressed in military – type uniforms and combat boots, usually in black or some other dark, psychologically intimidating color; are armed with the latest and most lethal submachine guns, high-powered sniper rigles, and pistols with high-capacity magazines; are protected by military-grade body armor, helmets, and riot shields; and in some cases are even provided with armored vehicles and machine guns – all in all, troops better equipped for street fighting than were the common soldiers who fought on either side in the battle of Stalingrad.

Absent a more plausible explanation, a natural conclusion is that these developments are intended, not simply to elaborate the intrastructure for a first class police state “from sea to shining sea”, and not just physically to train and psychologically to indoctrinate the personnel to operate it, but also (and of even more ominous long-term importance) mentally to condition common Americans in critical ways: namely,

first, to lull Americans into accepting as their regualr “police ” officers individuals identifiable by the style of ther uniforms as “military” personnel, so that actual military forces can be called in at any time to “police” those communities without causing an imediate adverse public reaction;

second, insofar as the uniforms the “police” wear reflect the style of their “policing”, to dupe Americans into acquiescing in permanent ersatz “martial law”, characterized by arbitary, domineering conduct on the part of the “authorities”, and robotic obedience on the part of the citizens;

third, insofar as the weapons the “police” carry reflect the level of violence they will routinely employ, to intimidate Americans into allowing the “police” always to threaten and often to use disproportionate force in the normal course of events, and to apply grossly excesive, even sadistic force in whatever they consider abnormal situations; and, at lenth,

fourth, to frighten Americans into believing that any remonstrance, let alone resistance, to the “police” forces’ disdain for, oppression of, and even brutality towards the general public will result only in firther and more intense disdain, oppression, and brutality, with no speedy or adequate legal recourse available; so that

fifth, Americans finally see themselves as being helplessly and hopelessly subject to the “police”, rather than see and maintain the “police” in constitionally proper subordination to WE THE PEOPLE.

To begin to put an end to this process, a strong light needs to be shined into its dark corners. So CHSAs should take the lead in public demands to know at least:

* which public officials and agenies have authorized and are promoting and facilitating the para-militarization of State and Local police forces;

* what are the sources and amonts of money paying for it;

* what specialzed training and indoctrination are members of such para-militaarized police forces receiving, and under whose direction;

* to which officials and agencies do SWAT and other specialized police units answer in their chanins of command, and by what authority, under what circumstances, and for what purposes can officials and agenies at higher levels of government intervene in or take over that commad;

* what situations are foreseen in which such para-militarized police forces, supplied with armaments suitable at least for low-intensity warfare, will be necessary to maintain “law and order” in the typical American communities in which they are deployed:

* what official directives, policies, or other guidelines exist for the so called “rules of engagement”, deployment, and tactics of para-militarized police forces in such situations;

* what arrangements – on what authority, for what purposes, under what conditions, and subject to whose command – have been made for cooperation in State and Local “police” operations between para-militarized police forces and the regualr Armed Forces; and

* what legal briefs, memoranda, or studies have been prepared to support the proposition that “Warrants issued upon probable cause”, writs of habeas corpus, and other forms of judicial review of executive action should or may be dispensed with, suspended, or disallowed when Americans are seized by para-militarized police forces in certain situations? For example, the Constitution provides that “the Privilege of the Writ of habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it”. A key issue then becdomes: What actually constitute – or what will “the authoriteies” claim constitute – those “cases of Rebellion or Invasion”, under color of which common Americans may be held indefinitely without access to the writ?

If what should be expected as the answers to these questions do not prove the need for CHSAs, and do not lead to demands on the part of the general public to revitalize “the Militia of the several States” posthaste, then America is probably too far gone to be salvaged.

If Nixon was bad for lying about Watergate then Obama is bad for lying about his birth certificate.

•May 24, 2011 • Leave a Comment

I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it.
George Bernard Shaw

I’m the pig (male chauvinist, if you prefer) and I’ve already won what I wanted – through my argument bait I have caught the attention of a beautiful women

who is my intellectual equal, Am.

Actually, I know I have much to learn about building consensus through discourse so I appreciate your help.

May we agree that eventhough we may see reality differently through our perspectives we share a common desire to see justice

done and to see that all are treated equally under the law? Presidents, women, men, etc.?

So, aren’t we seeking to gain understanding we didn’t have before we had this conversation? We want to serve each other and

the greater good so let’s play nice, what do you say?

I’ll try, too.

After considering your view of my speech I see now that I did give a perception different from what I intended and so I’ll

attempt to clarify what I mean.

When I said people are arrogant to want things that are new and to change, what I mean is: this desire is out of balance.

As I look to understand our U.S. Constitution I see that the problems we face today were the same one’s our founders

considered and drafted the document to protect against such abuses ( such as a conflict in loyalty due to dual citizenship );

so, I’m calling for researched respect to be given to our existing laws before we make new ones or else we’ll see our

desendents make new laws to improve upon improvements and this practice does not serve the rule of law if we don’t preserve

as much as we produce, right? If it aint broke, don’t fix it, I’m saying.

Communists, in comparison, say its broke so burn the fu^&er!

To end my point about arrogance I find it scary and amusing that the people that hate the idea of God are the ones who most

want to act like a God.

For example, our government now partially admits they are spraying nanoparticles of aluminum and other toxins into the air in

order to cool the earth. They didn’t tell us about it or ask our opinion they just do it like they do everything else these

days because if they don’t do whatever (the ends justify the means – Machiavelli) then some terrorist will so we better just go ahead and do it ourselves so we can be

badder than the bad guys because that’s how you become the best.

Yeah, that’s a stupid idea when anything gets so out of

balance that the solution is worse than the problem it was issued to solve, right?

This is not my opinion only, there are many scientists who are alarmed that governments are overstepping the authority we

give them and they are trying to be the sole definers of what is going on in reality and that anyone who questions what

government does is a conspiracy theorist. So, its TRUTHERs ( I love that lame cut down, am I supposed to be ashamed for seeking truth?!)

Or we could go along with a pattern of behavior popular today. We could say that anyone that questions government is a

conspiracy theorist.

We could say that government is almost always truthful and that anyone that questions it weakens it. That would be similar

to how the church killed Gallileo for daring to use his personal powers of simple observation to question the church and that the earth is round, not flat.

I don’t care how popular the witch hunt is, I’m not taking part in it.

See, this is the issue I’m concerned about. Not the birth certificate but the fact that if I ask simple basic questions

about why President Obama was given a pass to not show his credentials like Hillary and all the other Presidential hopefulls

before had to. That’s not fair.

So, I don’t care if its popular to bash me as a conspiracy theorist. I learned from black people that people can call you a nigger all day long but they are the one’s that will have egg on their faces within the pages of history.

Just to be an FBI agent one must undergo extreme background checks because of the sensitive nature of their work and so

questions of loyalty are important.

Certainly a President who can launch nuclear world death at the touch of a button must really but put through the ringer

because of the great responsibility his power demands?

If laws aren’t equally applied then this is a crime. As I’m sure you are fully aware, we live in a world where that is

predominantly what happens. Cops go around arresting poor drug addicted people but let bankers, addicted to legal drugs steal all our money in broad daylight because they are too big to fail. Yes, eventhough they are criminals we can’t prosecute powerful people or else the whole system will crash, they say.

So when I hear about women’s rights, black rights, etc. it perturbs me because predjudices are applied to all subsets of

humanity, including how white men and humanity as a whole is targeted by the few who wish to control the many so that they get us to go along with their plan to eliminate most of us and get us to consider ourselves a burden to the people like celebrities and noted scientists who are the cream of the crop.

Have you listened to heavy metal music lately or paid attention to the human overpopulation/global warming debate? My God, it is such a sad obvious Satanic cult of self-hate the world hasn’t seen since Dr. Kavorkian made a kill yourself in the privacy of your own home primer.

In defiance of the co-operation of all members of society and color of skin and sex, who gave thanks for all life that made America the envy of the world,

these people who do control much of what should be the commonwealth believe it serves humanity to play by a different set of

rules than us whom they regard as subjects to their whims.

This cult of self hate is the repeating theme of species suicide that is subversively implanted into our food, water, air and popular culture.

Presidents today have the power to issue executive orders and NATO attacks Pakistan preimptively so this is the new world

order where forcing what is right to happen is more important than people choosing what is right on their own and through

persuasive conscious discourse.

Jeez! I thought control by force was the old world order, but what do I know?

You obviously value choice as a democrat or you wouldn’t want me to choose to value your argument, right?

Assholes don’t care about choice when they can force their way to what they want (Dominique Khan raping the maid, for


Women have to learn how to survive under the burden of being physically weaker than men, in general based on evolution, and

being responsible for where future humans come from. Though, I’m sure that responsibility will be handed over to machines

and gay men as soon as possible. So, any of us can be considered to be a member of a weaker minority, right?

Ofcourse there is nothing weak about being in a minority or someone having more strength than I. Any idiot can have a gun or goon squad to sick on the unpopular, right?

I’m smart enough to choose not to see myself as a victim (I fail on that often as well).

Jewish people are another group who are powerful because they learned how to triumph from their adversity and weaker position

in that they have always been used by the dominant majorities they work for.

Nathaniel Rothschild was determined to never let some asshole king screw him over as a banker and Jew so he learned how to

screw them over since kings, and now Presidents since the Fed Reserve finally took hold in 1913, now are just idiots who have

to borrow money from banks for their little army playsets and technical baubles.

All that backstory had to be mentioned because the bankers scheming is the motivating force (you’re right again, Am, I

mispoke earlier) not behind the women’s movement or black power or the revolution taking place currently in the Middle East

but they are they catalyst which co-opts organizations like the United States and European Union to pervert their aims to

serve their bidding which is for us to serve them as an authority instead of their institutions serving all of mankind, as servants, like they advertise with the U.N.

I’m saying that the whole system is crashing and its not doing so naturally but because the rule of law has gone to the same

place all the money went to… the few who wish to control the many.

Again, this relationship between the powerful few and the productive many is the only politics worth considering.

President Obama never did anything worthy of being nominated for President. If he was proud of his record he would let us

see it. In truth, we don’t know anything about his past. The birth certificate is just the tip of the iceberg. When

investigative journalists try to research his past they find his friends won’t speak about it and what Obama and his

supporters do tell is a lie.

One of the few mentions of his dear old Mom is this, “She was a hippy.”

Really? Last time I checked she was learning Russian in Hawaii which leads to the idea that she was in fact a CIA agent who worked against Communism (that was back when the CIA was worthy of some worship). Now, its just some guy in Washington telling some Navy Seal to shoot someone in the face. That isn’t very sophisticated is it? That kind of agency wouldn’t be worthy of making the entire James Bond series after now would it?

Here’s a question. Any hospital that birthed a President would have his birth certificate in a shrine for all to see as hospital authorites gleem with pride, yes?

Instead, we were told that there was no long form birth certificate existed for anyone which is an easy lie to disprove because there are other

people still alive from that time and place who know different.

And remember, it was Obama himself who brought this story out of the past and chose to break into tv coverage of schmucky

Donald Trump whose sole purpose was to make any researchers look like fools by betting all his chips on the birth certificate

issue and get his payoff from ABC to continue his sad Apprentice show franchise for his work in discrediting the teaparty.

Instead, what Obama released is an embarrasing fake not according to me but photoshop experts, many of which are diehard

democrats but can’t shake their knowledge in spite of that fact.

Here’s more about that:

The FBI could have done an impervious forgery but what we got was probably the work of someone close to Obama whom he could

trust but wasn’t a forgery expert.

So, those are questions about the authenticity of the documents in consideration that you might also wish to investigate to

know what experts are saying, right?

I’m just relating that info to you, please don’t shoot the messenger.

Its like how stupid the news wants us to be. They want us to argue about these issues like the birth certificate, taxes and


The birth certificate is worth me pointing to now only because it reveals Obama is caught lying. As we all know from

experience, when we lie it makes us lie again and again to cover the original lie and it creates a giant lie that can either

be hidden to all or be the undoing of very powerful people.

That’s not where the real money is. Its in our debt.

Social Justice is horseshit if it doesn’t take into account how economics works. That’s the problem with liberals. They are

right to say that if we screw over the little people then we’ll all have to pay the price in terms of crime and unhappy

unproductive people; but, they want to turn to big daddy government to fix everything and Big Daddy is an asshole who takes

all our money and gives us table scraps and we deserve it because we’d rather watch Dancing with the Stars and go drinking

instead of actually spend our free time doing anything actually worthwhile and control our own culture instead of CONSUMING

what Big Daddy and LOVING MOMMY have made for us. Experts are important but if we don’t verify what they are doing then they

will do exactly what we do – not consider us like we don’t consider them.

Conservatives are full of shit because they let neo conservatives get us into pointless wars and hand out favors to

megacorporations and then preach to us the value of the free market. Bullshit. We have cronie capitalism or fascism, not a

free market. I can fly to Hong Kong today, get off the plane and go to a government office, fill out a single sheet of paper

application and sell coffeemugs, pay a tiny fee and do it the same day I got there.

We don’t have anything like that here in America anymore. Beyond those hurdles, we are spoiled and picky so we don’t start

businesses, we let Mexicans and Chinese people come here and open restaurants and real estate offices because they possess

what we have squandered… the knowledge that if you are free to offer your work to the market, your children will be free to

get a higher education (except that now you have borrow so much money to go to shcool that even doctors and lawyers have a

tough time making ends meet or actually having time to see their families.

We could raise the tax rate to 100% and it would not be enough to pay off our debt so all the discussions the news wants us

to have are like how I distract my toddler son when he cries – with toys.

Al Gore wrote a book entitled “Assault on Reason”. I agree but ironically his global warming caused by man slideshow is so full of horsepoo that the movie can’t be shown to schoolkids in England unless it is accompanied by an extensive book of rebuttles as ordered by a court there.

It looks more like the movie idiocracy to me. People more often attack my character and don’t even hear my argument, let alone respond to it. This irrational preference is what I fear.

Did President Obama release his long form birth certificate?

I’m sure if it was silly Bushy who was President then you’d be calling for equal protection under the law. I exhibit this

duplicitous nature myself. One telling the truth and having integrity regardless of how it serves one’s personal desires has become more rare than unicorn sightings.

I believe that there are common values, laws and needs that we must respect beyond our differences. For example, we all have

to breathe air and we hope that is clean air, right? No one but a fool would try to argue out of that.

Ok, so I haven’t been following botoxgate enough, I’m sorry. I’ll take you at your word that she admitted its a hoax but doesn’t that bring the gullibillity of mainstream news into question? Especially since we just witnessed the “OMG! my child is in a balloon hoax. As well, its common knowledge that child beauty pagaents are and should be the bane of feminists. Will you accept this as supporting evidence in this court of public opinion?

Oh, yeah. I think next quip belongs to you – “News Flash!” (lol) Just because information is in a youtube video doesn’t in itself make it false. What source do you want for Gloria Steinam’s extensive CIA credentials? How about Redstockings? A famous journal of the women’s liberation movement or perhaps the New York Times is more to your liking?

Did you know only 600,000 subscribe to the NYTimes? Yeah, I was shocked too until I remembered that the whole purpose of mainstream media is to amplify the propaganda of a small powerful (via money) minority. Blogs are how a small (via researched truth) minority defeat the evil empire.

More on that here:

As well, this info reports what should be common knowledge that government agents have infiltrated every important group there ever was. The Greatful Dead being famous for handing out LSD wouldn’t have been possible without the funding and infiltations of our CIA.

What we don’t know or don’t accept can harm us, can’t it?

Speaking of feminists, what happened to them? They went the way of Virginia Slim 100 cigarettes and shoulderpads in women’s clothing didn’t they?

Is Britney Spears wearing slave collars an example of today’s modern women and how she has wrestled man for her power and won? It used to be that celebrities hid their porn tapes but now it makes them famous. The obvious fact is that after the subversives at the shell of an intelligence agency we now have were done with feminism it was dumped like a dead body. The same with the music business. The corporate users finally found a way to make money off music so they moved in big with Elvis and the Beatles. Now, anyone can get any music for free anytime. Oh, look, now you can’t make money off of it and the mainstream has finally caught up with my OPINION that music sucks. With the exception of the local scene which is booming because people aren’t doing it for the money now are they?

Again, I’m so sorry that my argument doesn’t fit within the tiny 420 character space facebook provides for a status update. News has trained us to prefer soundbites. Isn’t that interesting?!? The book 1984 by George Orwell predicted just such a preference for attention deficit friendly formatting? While I do appreciate poetry within my prose, I’ll stand in good company with the wordy nerds such as Shakespeare or Charlotte Bronte.

Speaking of Orwell’s 1984, here’s a quote I appreciate. “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth IS a revolutionary act.”

So, I’ll attempt to be succinct. We should research Obama’s past the same way we would any president. Or is that another conspiracy theory?

Now, remember, Am. As you feel a sense of rage build in you in response to my response. I’m the evil male pig that is the wellspring for your greatest passions and I don’t even know you – much to my displeasure.

Ok. So, I’ve had my fun. Again, more important than me being recognized for the value of my consideration, I want to thank you for motivating me to state my case and click on your profile to get a better look at your pretty face. : )

•May 12, 2011 • Leave a Comment